Top News
Supreme Court disposes pleas seeking CBI probe into Ram Mandir Donation Embezzlement Supreme Court dismisses alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s plea challenging Delhi HC’s refusal to stay his conviction 200 crore extortion case: Delhi court issues fresh summons to actress Nora Fatehi The New Indian Express moves Supreme Court against Bombay HC barring its events outside South India SC dismisses plea challenging state’s use of AI-enabled facial recognition technology Kochi Mercedes Hit & Run: Kerala Court agrees to hold in-camera hearing of pleas challenging accused minor’s bail Justice PV Narasimha recuses from plea seeking to finalise Memorandum of procedure for judges' appointments Supreme Court agrees to hear plea against ex-minister Md. Azam Khan’s arrest just 40 minutes after release

‘These are Young Students,’ SC Dismisses Plea Seeking Review of Delhi Police FIRs Against CJP Protesters

The top court had directed the police to quash FIRs registered against protestors who participated in CJP led protests between 20 and 25 July.
Image Credit: ANI

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking an investigation into the FIRs registered by Delhi Police against student protesters who participated in CJP-led Jantar Mantar protests in July. The court observed that the petition amounted to challenging the top court’s earlier order quashing the FIRs and barring new FIRs. 

“Your client should see our order. This petition is like seeking review of our order,” CJI said. 

The court clarified that it had exercised its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to quash the FIRs considering the future of the student protestors. 

“You say we should not have invoked Article 142 and quashed FIRs. Please appreciate, these are young students. You have to see their parents, their future. We don’t want them to have come to court,” CJI Surya Kant said. 

The CJI also mentioned a recent order quashing criminal cases in Himachal Pradesh over public protests held during the Covid-19 pandemic, considering that the protestors were young students, not hardened criminals. 

The petitioner’s counsel, Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, submitted that the judiciary cannot interfere in police functions as they are “independent and sovereign.” Nedumpara questioned the maintainability of the PIL, arguing that people approach the court as if it were their “private property.”

To recall, the Delhi Police had registered FIRs during CJP-led protests between 20 and 25 July against NEET paper leak and alleged irregularities in the education system. The action invited public outrage. Later, the Supreme Court ordered the quashing of those FIRs.

The current petition by L Ramanathan sought a declaration that the police have independent authority in law and order and criminal investigation matters, and that there shall be no interference unless the police violate the law. It seeks directions to the Centre, the Delhi Police Commissioner, and the Delhi Government to ensure independent investigation into the FIRs registered over the July protests.