Top News
Supreme Court disposes pleas seeking CBI probe into Ram Mandir Donation Embezzlement Supreme Court dismisses alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s plea challenging Delhi HC’s refusal to stay his conviction 200 crore extortion case: Delhi court issues fresh summons to actress Nora Fatehi The New Indian Express moves Supreme Court against Bombay HC barring its events outside South India SC dismisses plea challenging state’s use of AI-enabled facial recognition technology Kochi Mercedes Hit & Run: Kerala Court agrees to hold in-camera hearing of pleas challenging accused minor’s bail Justice PV Narasimha recuses from plea seeking to finalise Memorandum of procedure for judges' appointments Supreme Court agrees to hear plea against ex-minister Md. Azam Khan’s arrest just 40 minutes after release

‘Civil, Not Criminal Case:’ Bombay HC Adjourns Imran Khan’s Plea Against ‘Leave India Notice’ To Nov 2

Khan had moved Bombay High Court challenging the FRRO Notice.
Image Credit: Instagram/imrankhan

The Bombay High Court today granted temporary relief to Actor Imran Khan in his plea challenging the ‘Leave India’ notice by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO). The court kept the FRRO order on hold and adjourned the matter till November 2. 

“Matter stands over to November 2 at 3 pm. The order under challenge shall be kept in abeyance till the next date,” the bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna observed. 

Appearing for the Centre, the Additional Solicitor General assured that no action will be taken against Khan. “The court may keep it on Monday. Nothing will happen. That is an oral assurance,” he said.  

When Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond raised a preliminary objection to the intervention application, the court said, “This is a civil consequence. We do not see a criminality attached to this.” The court further observed that it could send the matter ot the registry to verify if ASG had any objections to it. 

To recall, Khan had moved the Bombay High Court on October 17, seeking to quash FRRO’s “Leave India” notice on October 14. The FRRO notice actually required Khan to leave India by October 28.  Khan had argued that the FRRO notice bypassed Section 7D of the Citizenship Act, which makes it mandatory to grant a hearing to a person before revoking their OCI status. 

(With inputs from ANI)