Top News
Delhi Police files FIR against Prashant Bhushan for circulating fake video of Russian foreign minister Supreme Court upholds verdict that recognised power of States to impose surcharge on sales tax Delhi HC to hear plea on Friday seeking action against police officials allegedly threatening lawyers Supreme Court to hear on November 5 former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal’s plea for interim bail Supreme Court: Laws penalising people for having more than two children has lost relevance Delhi HC dismisses plea seeking ban on online gaming apps Delhi HC issues notice to CBSE, NCERT on plea seeking permission to use calculators in class XII board exams Delhi HC refuses to entertain PIL challenging theatrical release of film ‘Suryaa’ Siddaramaiah fake sting video: Bengaluru court grants interim relief to Kripa Alva Delhi Govt gives consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against CJP’s Ratna Singh Tamil Nadu CM Vijay writes to PM Modi requesting to set up a Bench of the Supreme Court in Chennai

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre on Plea to Regulate Social Media for Children

Top Court seeks a response from the Government on petition seeking age-based curbs for children

New Delhi [India], October 16 (ANI): The Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response to a plea seeking a regulatory framework to restrict children’s access to social media platforms and protect them from online harms.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice to the Centre and posted the matter for further hearing on December 7.

The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Indore-based Emerald Heights International School and its Director, Siddharth Singh.

The petition sought age-based restrictions on social media use, including a ban on access for children below a prescribed age.

The petition sought a comprehensive policy to address risks such as cyberbullying, online grooming, sexual exploitation, exposure to harmful content and addictive platform design. 

It also flagged concerns over depression, anxiety, body-image issues, sleep disruption and the misuse of children’s personal data.

The petitioners contend that voluntary safeguards and parental controls are insufficient to address these risks. 

They have also sought a declaration that the government’s failure to put adequate protections in place violates children’s fundamental rights, including the rights to equality, life and personal liberty, and education.

(with ANI inputs)